TL;DR:
- CQC issues four official ratings for health and social care services in England, based on percentage scores and key question assessments. A service’s overall rating reflects its performance across five domains, with rules preventing high scores from masking serious flaws. Families should evaluate both the percentage scores and detailed reports to understand each service’s true quality.
The Care Quality Commission (CQC) issues four official ratings for health and social care services in England: Outstanding, Good, Requires improvement, and Inadequate. Since the scoring update, each rating also carries a percentage score that shows where a service sits within its band:
These percentages come from scores assigned to individual quality statements, which are then grouped under five equally weighted key questions: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive, and Well-led. Understanding how those scores build up helps you read a CQC report with much more confidence.
Pro Tip: When checking a service, look at the percentage score alongside the rating label. A service at 64% (lower Good) is in a very different position from one at 85% (upper Good), even though both carry the same headline rating.
The four labels are not just grades. Each one carries a specific meaning about the quality of care people receive.
A rating reflects the published judgement at the time of the most recent inspection. It can change after a new assessment, so always check the date on any report you read. Ratings also apply at different levels: an individual service location, a provider organisation, and in some cases a wider trust or group. The aggregation rules that connect those levels are covered later.
The scoring process has three stages. First, inspectors assign a score of 1 to 4 to each quality statement, where 1 means significant shortfalls and 4 means an exceptional standard. Second, those scores are totalled and divided by the maximum possible score to produce a percentage for each key question. Third, that percentage maps to one of the four rating bands.
| Score | Descriptor | Percentage band |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Outstanding | 88–100% |
| 3 | Good | 63–87% |
| 2 | Requires improvement | 39–62% |
| 1 | Inadequate | 38% or lower |
Scoring is not purely mechanical. CQC inspectors apply professional judgement to ensure the final score reflects the overall picture rather than a simple arithmetic average. Two services with identical percentage totals can receive different narrative descriptions if the evidence tells different stories.
Since December 2024, CQC now scores at quality statement level rather than at evidence-category level. Draft reports may still show nominal evidence-category entries because of an IT workaround. Do not treat those entries as independent judgements; they are a technical artefact of the transition.
When CQC first applies the new framework to a service, it may assign initial scores from existing key question ratings so that unassessed quality statements have continuity values. A previous Good rating, for example, would generate initial quality statement scores of 3.
Pro Tip: A percentage score in the upper range of Requires improvement (close to 62%) is worth noting. It suggests the service is close to the Good threshold and may be improving, especially if the inspection date is recent.
Every CQC inspection is structured around five equally weighted key questions. Here is what each one covers in practice:
Because the five questions carry equal weight in aggregation, a weakness in any one of them can pull down an overall rating. Families reading a report should scan all five domain summaries, not just the headline.
Pro Tip: In a CQC report, look for the phrases “we found” and “people told us.” These signal direct evidence rather than policy statements. Recurring concerns across multiple sections are a stronger warning sign than a single isolated comment.
CQC uses two main types of inspection. A comprehensive inspection covers the whole service across all five key questions and typically produces a full set of updated ratings. A focused inspection targets specific key questions or areas of concern and follows the same evidence-gathering rigour, but it can update domain ratings without immediately changing the overall rating.
Evidence is gathered from multiple sources: records and care plans, direct observation, conversations with people using the service, staff interviews, and data submitted by the provider. Ongoing assessment between inspections can also update quality statement scores over time.
What triggers a focused re-inspection?
Inspection frequency varies by risk profile. Services rated Good or Outstanding are inspected less often than those rated Requires improvement or Inadequate, where CQC monitors progress more closely.
Aggregation works from the bottom up. Quality statement scores combine into a key question percentage, which maps to a key question rating. Those five key question ratings then combine into an overall service rating. Above that, CQC consolidates multiple service or location ratings into a provider rating, and in some cases a trust-level rating, giving five levels of ratings in total.
The aggregation rules include important blocking provisions:
These blocking rules exist to prevent strong scores in some areas from masking serious failings elsewhere. A service that scores exceptionally on Caring and Well-led but has a quality statement scored 1 under Safe cannot achieve an overall Good rating.
Pro Tip: When reading a report, check whether any quality statement is scored 1. That single score can be more significant than the overall percentage, because it acts as a ceiling on the rating the service can receive.
For services, a published rating is a public record. An Inadequate rating can trigger enforcement action, including warning notices, conditions on registration, or in serious cases suspension or cancellation of registration. A Requires improvement rating requires the service to produce an action plan and demonstrate progress.
For families, the practical implications depend on which domain is underperforming. A service rated Good overall but Requires improvement for Safe deserves closer scrutiny than its headline suggests.
If a service you are considering is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate, here are some questions to ask:
If you have concerns about a service a family member is already using, you can contact CQC directly or speak to your local authority adult social care team.
Pro Tip: Never rely on a draft report. Published ratings are the only official judgement. Check the publication date on the CQC website before drawing any conclusions, and note whether the report covers a focused or comprehensive inspection.
When reading the report, focus on:
Pro Tip: Use the CQC website’s “history” tab for a service to see how ratings have changed over time. A service that has moved from Requires improvement to Good across two consecutive inspections is demonstrating genuine progress.
Home care agencies are subject to the same CQC framework as residential services, but the inspection evidence looks different. Inspectors visit people in their own homes, speak with carers during visits, and review care plans that must reflect individual routines and preferences.
Kells-care has been regulated by CQC for over 30 years, providing domiciliary care across London with fully qualified, DBS-checked carers. That regulatory history means the five key questions are embedded in day-to-day practice: staffing decisions, training records, and person-centred care planning are all areas inspectors examine closely.
When speaking to any home care agency, frame your questions around the five key questions:
In a strong CQC report for a home care service, look for phrases such as “people told us their carers arrived on time and knew their preferences” or “the registered manager demonstrated a clear understanding of each person’s individual needs.” These signal person-centred practice rather than box-ticking. You can also find a ready-made list of questions to ask home care agencies to help you compare providers confidently.
CQC ratings are built from quality statement scores that map to four bands: Outstanding (88–100%), Good (63–87%), Requires improvement (39–62%), and Inadequate (38% or lower), with blocking rules that prevent serious failings from being hidden by strong scores elsewhere.
| Point | Details |
|---|---|
| Check the overall rating and date | A rating is only as current as its inspection date; always verify when the report was published. |
| Read all five key question domains | Equal weighting means a weak domain can pull down the overall rating significantly. |
| Note any score of 1 | A single quality statement scored 1 blocks a Good or Outstanding overall rating under aggregation rules. |
| Use percentage scores for context | A service at 64% Good is closer to the Requires improvement threshold than one at 85% Good. |
| Kells-care is CQC-regulated | Kells Domiciliary Care has operated under CQC regulation for over 30 years, with qualified, DBS-checked carers across London. |
The move to quality statement level scoring, implemented in December 2024, is more significant than it might appear. Previously, evidence categories were the unit of measurement, which meant a service could score well on a category even when specific practices within it were inconsistent. Scoring at quality statement level forces a more granular judgement.
What this means for families is that the percentage score now carries more information than before. A service sitting at 71% Good is not just “Good.” It is telling you something about the distribution of its quality statement scores, and the narrative in the report will show you where the weaker statements are.
My view is that families should resist the temptation to treat the percentage as the whole story. A service at 78% with strong narrative evidence of person-centred care and responsive leadership is often a better choice than one at 82% with thin report examples and a recent management change. The number gives you a starting point. The report gives you the substance.
For home care specifically, the Caring and Responsive domains tend to reveal the most about day-to-day experience. Look for specific examples, not general statements. And if a service is CQC-regulated with a consistent track record, that regulatory continuity is itself a meaningful signal of commitment to quality.
Kells-care has supported London families for over 30 years, providing personalised, CQC-regulated home care services with fully qualified, DBS-checked carers. If you are comparing home care options and want a clear, practical starting point, the free home care guide covers what to look for in a provider, how to interpret care plans, and the questions worth asking before you commit. Download it, share it with family members involved in the decision, and get in touch with the Kells-care team to discuss your specific situation.
The following official CQC pages were used to build this article. They are the best place to verify details or read the full guidance:
Always consult the original inspection report for full context. Ratings and report details change after new inspections, so check the publication date on the CQC website before drawing conclusions. This article provides general information; for advice specific to your situation, contact CQC directly or speak with a qualified care professional.
Discover how to explain learning disabilities and support your child in the UK. Our guide…
Discover essential dementia behaviour management steps that caregivers can follow to support patients effectively and…
Discover effective meal planning for dementia patients to enhance their wellbeing and energy through nutrient-rich,…
Learn how to create dementia routines that reduce distress and enhance well-being. Discover four essential…
Discover how to explain behaviour management effectively in 2026. Learn proactive strategies to foster positive…
Discover why routine is important for your mental health. Learn how a daily structure can…